19.3 Suggestions
for changes to the Licences
19.3.1 Works Licence
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)
A
MoU is being developed for the provision of dilution flows when the salinity of
drainage water exceeds 700 mS/cm. DLWC has agreed to divert water for its
downstream customers using DC800 or the Outfall Drain or if necessary both to
control salinity impact. When no water
is diverted for DLWC, CICL will provide dilution flows. In the past five years DLWC flows have been
diverted through CICL’s drainage system for 91 percent of the months during the
irrigation seasons. If DLWC’s usage of
CICL’s drainage system changes, the MoU will be re-negotiated.
CICL
agrees to modify the Works Licence condition reflecting this agreement.
LWMP monitoring conditions
In regard to the inclusion of LWMP
monitoring conditions in the Works Licence, the CICL community believes that
LWMP conditions must remain within the LWMP deed as an appendix, which can be
modified by the LWMP Management Committee as required.
Conjunctive water usage and crop monitoring
In
the past CICL has requested that DLWC modify conditions on the groundwater
licences within CICL’s operational area to include reporting of crop
groundwater usage. This issue is still being discussed.
Equity in reporting
An
inequity has been created in that the reporting requirement for CICL differs
significantly to that for other licence holders. It is suggested that this inequity be rationalised. CICL has raised this issue in the past (AER 1999).
19.3.2 Environment
Protection Licence
Recycling systems
An
issue related to recycling system requirements is under negotiation with both
the EPA and LWMPAT. It is hoped that
the relevant EPL condition will be changed upon conclusion of the discussions.
On-farm chemical usage
In
the past CICL and EPA have discussed the collection of on-farm chemical use
information. CICL is collecting this
information through the landholder survey, however the quality of this
information is poor.
Better
quality information may be collected through the chemical suppliers, but the
suppliers do not have any incentive to provide this information to CICL. Also for consideration is that this is
commercial information and suppliers are reluctant to make it public.
CICL
proposes that the EPL be modified so that chemical information is only
collected once every five years and that this information should be commercial
in confidence.
|